7 Hamilton’s theorem
This is the first genuine milestone, and the last one reachable by maximum-principle estimates alone. Positive Ricci curvature is a strong enough hypothesis that the flow never forms a singularity in an interesting way: it shrinks to a round point.
In dimension three the curvature operator has three eigenvalues \(\lambda \ge \mu \ge \nu \) — twice the sectional curvatures, normalised so that the scalar curvature is the trace \(\operatorname {scal}= \lambda +\mu +\nu \) and the Ricci eigenvalues are \(\tfrac 12(\mu +\nu ), \tfrac 12(\lambda +\nu ), \tfrac 12(\lambda +\mu )\) — and the reaction term \(\operatorname {Rm}^2 + \operatorname {Rm}^\# \) of the evolution equation 66 is diagonal in the same frame. The associated ODE is
Along its solutions on \([0,T]\):
the ordering \(\lambda \ge \mu \ge \nu \) is preserved (le_preserved_lm, le_preserved_mn);
positive Ricci curvature, \(\mu + \nu {\gt} 0\), is preserved (ricci_pos_preserved);
\(\lambda \le C(\mu +\nu )\) is preserved for every \(C \ge 1/2\) (bound_preserved);
given (1)–(3) at time \(0\), for \(0 \le \delta \) with \(\delta (2C+1) \le 1\) the ratio \((\lambda -\nu )/(\mu +\nu )^{1-\delta }\) is nonincreasing (pinching_antitone).
Item (4) is the pinching estimate of Hamilton’s paper (Theorem 10.1) for the ODE: the traceless part of the curvature is dominated by a smaller power of the scalar curvature, so wherever the curvature blows up it becomes constant-sectional to leading order.
Each quantity \(f\) satisfies \(\dot f = a f + (\text{a term of known sign})\) for a continuous \(a\): \((\mu -\lambda )\dot{} = (\mu -\lambda )(\lambda +\mu -\nu )\) exactly; \((\mu +\nu )\dot{} = \lambda (\mu +\nu ) + \mu ^2+\nu ^2\); \((\lambda - C(\mu +\nu ))\dot{} = \lambda (\lambda - C(\mu +\nu )) + (\mu \nu - C(\mu ^2+\nu ^2))\) with the bracket \(\le 0\) because \(\mu \nu \le (\mu ^2+\nu ^2)/2\). So \(f e^{-\int a}\) is monotone, which is the linear Grönwall comparison nonpos_of_deriv_le_mul. For (4), the logarithmic derivative of the ratio is \(\delta \lambda + (\nu -\mu ) - (1-\delta )(\mu ^2+\nu ^2)/(\mu +\nu )\), and with \(\lambda \le C(\mu +\nu )\), \(\nu \le \mu \) and \(\mu ^2+\nu ^2 \ge (\mu +\nu )^2/2\) this is at most \((\mu +\nu )\, (\delta (2C+1)-1)/2 \le 0\).
No manifold appears: this is the algebraic heart of Hamilton’s theorem, and everything else in the chapter is the machinery that transfers it from the ODE to the flow.
In dimension three positive Ricci curvature is preserved by the flow, and the eigenvalues pinch together relative to their size: the traceless part of \(\operatorname {Ric}\) is dominated by \(\operatorname {scal}^{1-\delta }\) for some \(\delta {\gt} 0\).
This is Lemma 89 transported from the ODE to the PDE by the tensor maximum principle 78: the sets \(\{ \mu +\nu \ge \epsilon \, \operatorname {scal}\} \), \(\{ \lambda \le C(\mu +\nu )\} \) and \(\{ \lambda -\nu \le C'(\mu +\nu )^{1-\delta }\} \) are closed, convex, and ODE-invariant. Convexity: the largest eigenvalue is convex and the smallest concave in the curvature operator, so \(\lambda - \nu \) and \(\lambda \) are convex, \(\mu + \nu = \operatorname {scal}- \lambda \) is concave, and \(t \mapsto t^{1-\delta }\) is concave increasing; each set is a sublevel set of a convex function against a concave one.
What is missing is more than a transfer. In order: the evolution equation 66 itself; the maximum principle on the bundle of curvature operators with the metric evolving on the fibres (Uhlenbeck’s trick), where 78 is proved for a fixed fibre; the convexity of the eigenvalue-defined sets, which needs the variational characterisation of eigenvalues; and Nagumo’s condition for these sets from the ODE invariance of 89, which is stated for eigenvalues and must be lifted to the operator ODE by equivariance.
Special to dimension three, where the Weyl tensor vanishes and \(\operatorname {Rm}\) is determined by \(\operatorname {Ric}\). The higher-dimensional analogues (Hamilton 1986 in dimension four, then Böhm–Wilking) are substantially harder and are not on this road.
\(|\nabla \operatorname {scal}| \le \eta \, \operatorname {scal}^{3/2}\) up to lower-order terms, so the scalar curvature is comparable at every pair of points as the flow shrinks.
Rescaling to fixed volume, the normalized flow exists for all time and converges exponentially in every \(C^k\) to a metric of constant positive sectional curvature.
A closed \(3\)-manifold admitting a metric of strictly positive Ricci curvature admits a metric of constant positive sectional curvature, and is therefore diffeomorphic to a spherical space form \(S^3/\Gamma \).
J. Differential Geometry 17 (1982), 255–306.
Stated formally in RicciFlowBlueprint/Hamilton.lean as hamilton_1982, via proof_wanted — so the statement is elaborated and type-checked, with no sorry and no added axiom. The hypothesis and conclusion are AdmitsPositiveRicciMetric and AdmitsConstPositiveSecMetric, both built on the \(\operatorname {Ric}\) and \(K\) definitions above. Each quantifies existentially over a \(C^1\) Levi-Civita connection of the metric and tests against \(C^2\) vector fields; by Theorem 11 the choice of connection is immaterial, so both are statements about the metric. (An earlier version tested sectional curvature against arbitrary fields, where \(R(X,Y)Y\) is junk, and required no regularity of the connection, where \(\operatorname {Ric}\) is junk; both were corrected in September 2026.) With Definition 13 both hypotheses become statements about \(\operatorname {Ric}(g)\) and \(K(g)\) directly: admitsPositiveRicciMetric_iff and admitsConstPositiveSecMetric_iff. It carries no \lean marker here because proof_wanted produces a private declaration that checkdecls cannot resolve.
The proof is years away. Stating it was not possible before 2026-08-13: neither \(\operatorname {Ric}\) nor \(K\) existed in any Lean library.